The evaluation of the study plans, in the implementation phase, is linked to the process evaluation. It refers to the implementation of the program by teachers and involves classroom observation and accompaniment processes. This process evaluation can be complemented by self-report by teaching teams about the quality of teacher-student interactions, level of achievement, strategies, activities, resources, and evaluation elements. A tool designed for this purpose, its construction and validation process, is presented. Each team of teachers of a subject carries out a reflection exercise on their experience at the end of a school period and agree on the improvements that will be made effective in the next period. The tool to evaluate the implementation has the purpose of facilitating the monitoring of the study plans designed by competencies, through the evaluation of the execution of their programs, facilitating the reflective processes of the teachers, the detection of weaknesses and strengths, as well as the presentation of improvement proposals. Academic authorities have pointed out the usefulness of the tool that reports on the implementation of the programs in all its elements and turns out to be key to supporting decision-making based on data evidence.
Carvajal-Ortiz, L., Florian-Gaviria, B., & Díaz, J. F. (2019). Models, methods and software prototype to support the design, evaluation, and analysis in the curriculum management of competency-based for higher education. In 2019 XLV Latin American Computing Conference (CLEI) (pp. 1-10). https://doi.org/10.1109/CLEI47609.2019.235114
Castillo-Vega, J. M., Donaire, C., Manso, J., & Lagunes-Dominguez, A. (2022). Formación docente inicial desde una perspectiva comparada entre España, Chile y Paraguay. RECIE. Revista Caribeña de Investigación Educativa, 6(2), 1-14. https://doi.org/10.32541/recie.2022.v6i2.pp1-14
Gervais, J. (2016). The operational definition of competency‐based education. The Journal of Competency‐Based Education, 1(2), 98-106. https://doi-org.bibliotecauned.idm.oclc.org/10.1002/cbe2.1011
Guárate de Hernández, A. Y. (2021). Evaluación del Diseño Curricular por competencias Especialidad Educación Primaria y la gestión en el Instituto de Mejoramiento Profesional del Magisterio. Los Teques. Revista de Investigación, 45(104), 332-360.
Hagan‐Short, M., & Addison, P. (2019). Competency‐based education: Multiple approaches‐a single institution. The Journal of Competency‐Based Education, 4(3), e01194. https://doi.org/10.1002/cbe2.1194
Irvine, C. K., & Kevan, J. M. (2017). Competency-based education in higher education. En Handbook of research on competency-based education in university settings (pp. 1-27). IGI Global. https://doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0932-5.ch001
Ministerio de Educación de la República Dominicana. (2016). Bases de la revisión y actualización curricular.
Ministerio de Educación Superior Ciencia y Tecnología. (2015). Normativa 9-2015 para la Formación Docente de Calidad en la República Dominicana.
Pérez-Juste, R. (2000). La evaluación de programas educativos: conceptos básicos, planteamientos generales y problemática. Revista de Investigación Educativa, 18(2), 261-287.
Pérez-Juste, R. (2017). Evaluación de programas educativos. (3.ª ed.). La Muralla.
Santana, E. (2020). Educación por competencias en República Dominicana: perspectiva crítica sobre la práctica. Ciencia y Educación, 4(2), 117-125. https://doi.org/10.22206/cyed.2020.v4i2.pp117-125
Sosa, J. L. (2018). Análisis de los procesos de rediseño curricular de los programas de formación de docentes en la República Dominicana. En J. M. Vázquez-Antonio (Coordinador), Reflexiones sobre la Evaluación Socioformativa (pp. 1-14). Centro Universitario CIFE.
Taveras-Sánchez, B. J. (2022). El acompañamiento pedagógico a docentes en la República Dominicana. La percepción de los acompañantes [Tesis Doctoral, Universidad de Sevilla].
Zabalza, M. Á., & Lodeiro-Enjo, L. (2019). El desafío de evaluar por competencias en la universidad. Reflexiones y experiencias prácticas. Revista Iberoamericana de Evaluación Educativa, 12(2), 29-48. https://doi.org/10.15366/riee2019.12.2.002
